Douglas v. State

180 So. 3d 231, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18794, 2015 WL 9241969
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Douglas v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 9038
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 16, 2015·No. No. 1D15-3669·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This petition for writ of mandamus seeks to compel a ruling on a motion for postconviction relief. The circuit court has recently issued an order which granted an evidentiary hearing on the pending motion. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. Munn. v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 807 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (holding that where the trial court has recently taken action, mandamus relief was not warranted). However, we encourage the circuit court to continue its efforts to expeditiously dispose of the motion pending below. See Wilson v. State, 775 So.2d 1003 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

ROBERTS, C.J., BENTON and KELSEY, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Douglas v. State, 180 So. 3d 231, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 18794, 2015 WL 9241969 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

180 So. 3d 231 (Douglas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Munn v. Florida Parole Commission
807 So. 2d 733 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Wilson v. State
775 So. 2d 1003 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)