DoubleLine Capital LP v. Odebrecht Finance, Ltd

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided December 8, 2020·No. 1:17-cv-04576·Unknown

Opinion

| USDC SDNY | DOCUMENT | ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OO i! FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED:_1 2/8/2020

DOUBLELINE CAPITAL LP, DOUBLELINE INCOME SOLUTIONS FUND, AND DOUBLELINE FUNDS TRUST (ON BEHALF OF ITS: 1) DOUBLELINE CORE FIXED INCOME FUND SERIES; 2) DOUBLELINE EMERGING MARKETS FIXED INCOME FUND SERIES; AND 3) DOUBLELINE SHILLER ENHANCED CAPE® SERIES), 1:17-cv-4576-GHW-BCM Plaintiffs, STIPULATED -against- CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT AND CONSTRUTORA NORBERTO ODEBRECHT, S.A., PROTECTIVE ORDER ODEBRECHT ENGENHARIA E CONSTRUCAO S.A. AND ODEBRECHT S.A., Defendants.

BARBARA MOSES, United States Magistrate Judge: WHEREAS, all of the parties to this action (collectively, the “Parties” and each individually, a “Party”) request that this Court issue a protective order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) to protect the confidentiality of nonpublic and competitively sensitive information that they may need to disclose in connection with discovery in this action; WHEREAS, the Parties, through counsel, agree to the following terms; and WHEREAS, this Court finds that good cause exists for issuance of an appropriately tailored confidentiality order governing the pretrial phase of this action; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Parties to this action, their respective officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, any other person in active concert or participation

with any of the foregoing, and all other persons with actual notice of this Order will adhere to the following terms, upon pain of contempt: 1. With respect to Discovery Material (i.e., information of any kind produced or disclosed in the course of discovery in this action), that a person has designated as “Confidential”

or “Highly Confidential” pursuant to this Order, no person subject to this Order may disclose such Confidential or Highly Confidential Discovery Material to anyone else except as expressly permitted hereunder: 2. The Party or person producing or disclosing Discovery Material (each, “Producing Party”) may designate as Confidential only the portion of such material that it reasonably and in good faith believes consists of: a. previously non-disclosed financial information (including without limitation profitability reports or estimates, percentage fees, design fees, royalty rates, minimum guarantee payments, sales reports, and sale margins); b. previously non-disclosed material relating to ownership or control of any non-

public company; c. previously non-disclosed business plans, product-development information, or marketing plans; d. any information of a personal or intimate nature regarding any individual; or e. any other category of information given confidential status by this Court after the date of this Order. 3. Additionally, the Producing Party may designate as Highly Confidential any portion of Discovery Material that it reasonably and in good faith believes (a) qualifies as Confidential as set forth in paragraph 2 hereof, and (b) is of such a confidential nature that disclosure to the Parties to this action would cause irreparable business harm or detriment to the Producing Party, including if the Producing Party reasonably believes non-designation would contravene applicable law. 4. With respect to the Confidential or Highly Confidential portion of any Discovery

Material other than deposition transcripts and exhibits, the Producing Party or its counsel may designate such portion as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” respectively by: (a) stamping or otherwise clearly marking as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” the protected portion in a manner that will not interfere with legibility or audibility; and (b) producing for future public use another copy of said Discovery Material with the confidential or highly confidential information redacted. 5. A Producing Party or its counsel may designate deposition exhibits or portions of deposition transcripts as Confidential or Highly Confidential Discovery Material either by: (a) indicating on the record during the deposition that a question calls for Confidential or Highly Confidential information, in which case the reporter will bind the transcript of the designated

testimony in a separate volume and mark it as “Confidential Information Governed by Protective Order” or “Highly Confidential Information Governed by Protective Order;” or (b) notifying the reporter and ALL counsel of record, in writing, within 30 days after a deposition has concluded, of the specific pages and lines of the transcript that are to be designated “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential,” in which case all counsel receiving the transcript will be responsible for marking the copies of the designated transcript in their possession or under their control as directed by the Producing Party or that person’s counsel. During the 30-day period following a deposition, all Parties will treat the entire deposition transcript as if it had been designated Confidential or Highly Confidential. 6. If at any time before the termination of this action a Producing Party realizes that it should have designated as Confidential or Highly Confidential some portion(s) of Discovery Material that it previously produced without limitation, the Producing Party may so designate such material by notifying all Parties in writing. Thereafter, all persons subject to this Order will

treat such designated portion(s) of the Discovery Material as Confidential or Highly Confidential. In addition, the Producing Party shall provide each other Party with replacement versions of such Discovery Material that bears the “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” designation within two business days of providing such notice. 7. Nothing contained in this Order will be construed as: (a) a waiver by a Party or person of its right to object to any discovery request; (b) a waiver of any privilege or protection; or (c) a ruling regarding the admissibility at trial of any document, testimony, or other evidence. 8. Where a Producing Party has designated Discovery Material as Confidential, other persons subject to this Order may disclose such information only to the following persons: a. the Parties to this action, their insurers, and counsel to their insurers in connection

with the prosecution, defense or settlement of this action; b. the Parties’ in-house counsel, solely to the extent reasonably necessary for such in-house counsel to assist in the prosecution, defense or settlement of this action and provided that such in-house counsel has first executed a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as Exhibit A hereto; c. counsel retained specifically for this action, including any paralegal, clerical, or other assistant that such outside counsel employs and assigns to this action; d. outside vendors or service providers (such as copy-service providers and document-management consultants) that counsel hire and assign to this action; e. any mediator or arbitrator that the Parties engage in this action or that this Court appoints, provided such person has first executed a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as Exhibit A hereto; f. as to any document, its author, its addressee, and any other person indicated on

the face of the document as having received a copy; g. any witness who counsel for a Party in good faith believes may be called to testify at trial or deposition in this action, provided such person has first executed a Non- Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as Exhibit A hereto; h. any person a Party retains to serve as an expert witness or otherwise provide specialized advice to counsel in connection with this action, provided such person has first executed a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as Exhibit A hereto; i.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DoubleLine Capital LP v. Odebrecht Finance, Ltd, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

DoubleLine Capital LP v. Odebrecht Finance, Ltd (DoubleLine Capital LP v. Odebrecht Finance, Ltd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)