DoubleLine Capital LP v. Odebrecht Finance, Ltd
Opinion
USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT a SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 11/13/20 DOUBLELINE CAPITAL LP, et al., we 17-CV-4576 (GHW) (BCM) Plaintiffs, . ORDER -against- ODEBRECHT FINANCE, LTD., et al., Defendants.
BARBARA MOSES, United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has received and reviewed the parties’ proposed stipulated confidentiality agreement and protective order. Prop. Order (Dkt. No. 128.) The Court declines to mandate, on pain of contempt, that "Discovery Material," even if non-confidential, be used solely "for prosecuting, defending or attempting to settle this action." Prop. Order 4 1; see Royal Park Invs. SA/NV vy. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co., 192 F. Supp. 3d 400, 406-407 (S.D.N.Y. 2016) (directing the parties to modify their protective order "to permit the use of non-confidential discovery materials for purposes other than 'the prosecution or the defense of this Action"). The parties may re-file a proposed protective order that does not present the issues raised in paragraph 1.
Dated: New York, New York SO ORDERED. November 13, 2020 Cad BARBARA MOSES United States Magistrate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
DoubleLine Capital LP v. Odebrecht Finance, Ltd (DoubleLine Capital LP v. Odebrecht Finance, Ltd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.