Donald Kenneth Fetterly v. David Paskett, Warden, Idaho State Prisons and Jim Jones, Attorney General of the State of Idaho

15 F.3d 1472
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 8, 1994·No. 90-35627·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinions

The panel has voted to deny appellees’ petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

The full court was advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. An active judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter faded to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en bane consideration. Fed.RApp.P. 35. Judges Kozinski, Hall, and Wiggins would grant the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

The petition for rehearing is denied and the suggestion for rehearing en bane is rejected.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Donald Kenneth Fetterly v. David Paskett, Warden, Idaho State Prisons and Jim Jones, Attorney General of the State of Idaho, 15 F.3d 1472 (9th Cir. 1994).

15 F.3d 1472 (Donald Kenneth Fetterly v. David Paskett, Warden, Idaho State Prisons and Jim Jones, Attorney General of the State of Idaho) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related