Doerfler v. Pottberg
178 A.D. 899
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Doerfler v. Pottberg. Read the opinion of the Court — 170 A.D. 578 →
Opinion
In view of the former decision of the court in this litigation (See 170 App. Div. 578; 218 N. Y. 27; 177 App. Div. 927), it would seem that this order was improperly made. It is, therefore, reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied. Jenks, P. J., Stapleton, Mills, Rich and Blaekmar, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Doerfler v. Pottberg, 178 A.D. 899 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).
178 A.D. 899 (Doerfler v. Pottberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Doerfler v. . Pottberg
112 N.E. 445 (New York Court of Appeals, 1916)
Doerfler v. Pottberg
170 A.D. 578 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)