Doerfler v. Pottberg
172 A.D. 969
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Doerfler v. Pottberg. Read the opinion of the Court — 170 A.D. 578 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1915·Published
Opinion
Order affirmed, without costs, but without prejudice to further application to the Special Term. (See Doerfler v. Pottberg, 170 App. Div. 578, decided herewith.) Jenks, P. J., Oarr, Stapleton, Mills and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Doerfler v. Pottberg, 172 A.D. 969 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).
172 A.D. 969 (Doerfler v. Pottberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Doerfler v. Pottberg
170 A.D. 578 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)