Doerfler v. Pottberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Doerfler v. Pottberg

177 A.D. 927

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1917

StatusPublished

This text of 177 A.D. 927 (Doerfler v. Pottberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Doerfler v. Pottberg, 177 A.D. 927 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, without prejudice to a renewal at the proper time. The plaintiff in neither action has proceeded with diligence. In one of the actions the defense of another action pending has been interposed. A stay will be seasonable when one of the actions has proceeded to judgment. Jenks, P. J., Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred; Carr, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, without prejudice to a renewal at the proper time. The plaintiff in neither action has proceeded with diligence. In one of the actions the defense of another action pending has been interposed. A stay will be seasonable when one of the actions has proceeded to judgment. Jenks, P. J., Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred; Carr, J., not voting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

177 A.D. 927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doerfler-v-pottberg-nyappdiv-1917.