Doe v. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
This text of 109 F.3d 1502 (Doe v. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
John DOE, Ph.D., and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY, John Nuckolls,
Director, Defendants.
and
The Regents of the University of California, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 93-16792.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
April 7, 1997.
On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States.
Before: CHOY, CANBY, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
The order of this court filed herein on March 24, 1997 is withdrawn.
The parties shall file supplemental briefs limited to the Section 1983 issue, appellants' brief to be filed within 14 days of the filing of this order, appellees' brief to be filed within 14 days of the filing of appellants' brief, and appellants' reply brief to be filed within 14 days of the filing of appellees' brief.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
109 F.3d 1502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doe-v-lawrence-livermore-national-laboratory-ca9-1997.