Doe v. Bruner
This text of 2013 Ohio 954 (Doe v. Bruner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as Doe v. Bruner, 135 Ohio St.3d 277, 2013-Ohio-954.]
DOE, APPELLANT, v. BRUNER, APPELLEE. [Cite as Doe v. Bruner, 135 Ohio St.3d 277, 2013-Ohio-954.] Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently accepted. (No. 2012-0556—Submitted February 27, 2013—Decided March 19, 2013.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Clinton County, No. CA2011-07-013, 2012-Ohio-761. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed as having been improvidently accepted. O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY, FRENCH, and O’NEILL, JJ., concur. __________________ Konrad Kircher, for appellant. Catherine Hoolahan, urging reversal on behalf of amici curiae National Center for Victims of Crime, National Crime Victim Law Institute, Justice League of Ohio, Ohio Coalition for Battered Women, Ohio Now Education and Legal Fund, Ohio Alliance to End Sexual Violence, Buckeye Region Anti- Violence Organization, Crime Victim Services, Cleveland Rape Crisis Center, and Ohio Victim Witness Association. ______________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2013 Ohio 954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/doe-v-bruner-ohio-2013.