Doe v. Bruner

2013 Ohio 954
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Doe v. Bruner. Read the opinion of the Court — 135 Ohio St. 3d 277
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 19, 2013·No. 2012-0556·Published

Opinion

[Cite as Doe v. Bruner, 135 Ohio St.3d 277, 2013-Ohio-954.]

DOE, APPELLANT, v. BRUNER, APPELLEE. [Cite as Doe v. Bruner, 135 Ohio St.3d 277, 2013-Ohio-954.] Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently accepted. (No. 2012-0556—Submitted February 27, 2013—Decided March 19, 2013.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Clinton County, No. CA2011-07-013, 2012-Ohio-761. __________________ {¶ 1} The cause is dismissed as having been improvidently accepted. O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY, FRENCH, and O’NEILL, JJ., concur. __________________ Konrad Kircher, for appellant. Catherine Hoolahan, urging reversal on behalf of amici curiae National Center for Victims of Crime, National Crime Victim Law Institute, Justice League of Ohio, Ohio Coalition for Battered Women, Ohio Now Education and Legal Fund, Ohio Alliance to End Sexual Violence, Buckeye Region Anti- Violence Organization, Crime Victim Services, Cleveland Rape Crisis Center, and Ohio Victim Witness Association. ______________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doe v. Bruner, 2013 Ohio 954 (Ohio 2013).

2013 Ohio 954 (Doe v. Bruner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Doe v. Bruner
985 N.E.2d 1288 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2013)