Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. Howe

2014 ND 17, 842 N.W.2d 646, 2014 WL 356939, 2014 N.D. LEXIS 18
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 31, 2014
Docket20140035
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 2014 ND 17 (Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. Howe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. Howe, 2014 ND 17, 842 N.W.2d 646, 2014 WL 356939, 2014 N.D. LEXIS 18 (N.D. 2014).

Opinion

INTERIM SUSPENSION ORDERED.

[¶ 1] On January 31, 2014, an Application for Order of Interim Suspension of Henry H. Howe, a member of the bar of North Dakota, was filed under N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 3.4. Howe was admitted to the practice in the courts of North Dakota on July 27, 1973, and is currently licensed.

[¶ 2] The Application asserts that Howe was charged with criminal conspiracy to commit murder in violation of N.D.C.C. § 12.1-06-04 and § 12.1-16-0(l)(a) (a Class AA felony). Documents in support of the Application assert that sufficient information exists that Howe poses a substantial threat of irreparable harm to the public because of the facts attested in the affidavit evidence a criminal conspiracy to obstruct justice by murdering a witness.

[¶ 3] The Application further asserts that Howe has violated N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 1.6(b) by failing to disclose information reasonably necessary to prevent death or serious bodily harm; N.D.R. Prof. Conduct. 3.4 by obstructing another party’s access to evidence; N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 8.4(b) by committing a criminal act that adversely reflects on Howe’s fitness as a lawyer; and N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 8.4(f) by engaging in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice.

[¶ 4] The Application includes a request for the appointment of a professional trustee to take control of Howe’s law practice to take the appropriate steps to protect the interests of Howe’s clients and his law firm.

[¶ 5] ORDERED, under N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 3.4(B), Henry H. Howe’s license to practice law in North Dakota is SUSPENDED effective immediately and until further order of this Court.

[¶ 6] FURTHER ORDERED, that Disciplinary Counsel apply to the district court for a professional trustee as provided in N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 6.4.

[¶ 7] FURTHER ORDERED, that Henry H. Howe comply with N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 6.3.

[¶ 8] GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., LISA FAIR McEVERS, CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, and DANIEL J. CROTHERS, JJ., concur. [¶ 9] The Honorable DALE V. SANDSTROM was unavoidably absent and did not participate in this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Reciprocal Discipline of Haderlie
2016 ND 189 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2016)
Howe v. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of North Dakota
2015 ND 182 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2015)
Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the North Dakota v. Howe
2014 ND 109 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2014)
Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State v. Howe
2014 ND 44 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2014 ND 17, 842 N.W.2d 646, 2014 WL 356939, 2014 N.D. LEXIS 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-board-of-the-supreme-court-of-the-state-of-north-dakota-v-nd-2014.