Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the North Dakota v. Howe

2014 ND 109, 847 N.W.2d 126, 2014 N.D. LEXIS 112, 2014 WL 2466281
CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court
DecidedMay 29, 2014
Docket20140035
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2014 ND 109 (Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the North Dakota v. Howe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the North Dakota v. Howe, 2014 ND 109, 847 N.W.2d 126, 2014 N.D. LEXIS 112, 2014 WL 2466281 (N.D. 2014).

Opinion

Interim Suspension Vacated.

[¶ 1] On January 31, 2014, we interim suspended Henry H. Howe until further order of this Court and ordered Disciplinary Counsel to apply to the district court for a professional trustee as provided for in N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 64. A professional trustee was appointed by the Grand Forks district court on January 31, 2014. On May 22, 2014, and in light of the dismissal of the criminal charges against Howe that formed the basis for the interim suspension, Disciplinary Counsel filed a Motion to Vacate Order of Interim Suspension. On May 23, 2014, David C. Thompson, counsel for Howe, filed a response to Disciplinary Counsel’s motion. The Court considered the matter, and

[¶ 2] ORDERED, that the Motion to Vacate the Interim Suspension entered in this matter on January 31, 2014, is granted. See Disciplinary Board v. Howe, 2014 ND 17, 842 N.W.2d 646.

[¶ 3] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Howe remains on suspension in a separate matter based on our opinion filed March 11, 2014, in Disciplinary Board v. Howe, 2014 ND 44, 843 N.W.2d 325.

[¶ 4] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Disciplinary Counsel apply to the Grand Forks district court to conclude the professional trusteeship and to release the trustee from the duties and obligations imposed by N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 64.

[¶ 5] GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., LISA FAIR McEVERS, CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, and DALE V. SANDSTROM, JJ., concur. [¶ 6]The Honorable DANIEL J. CROTHERS was unavoidably absent and did not participate in this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Howe v. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of North Dakota
2015 ND 182 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2014 ND 109, 847 N.W.2d 126, 2014 N.D. LEXIS 112, 2014 WL 2466281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/disciplinary-board-of-the-supreme-court-of-the-north-dakota-v-howe-nd-2014.