Dilsaver v. Dilsaver

439 N.W.2d 796, 232 Neb. 236, 1989 Neb. LEXIS 232
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedMay 19, 1989
Docket88-858
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 439 N.W.2d 796 (Dilsaver v. Dilsaver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dilsaver v. Dilsaver, 439 N.W.2d 796, 232 Neb. 236, 1989 Neb. LEXIS 232 (Neb. 1989).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The sole issue on appeal in this dissolution of marriage action is the custody of the two minor children of the parties. After finding that both parties were fit and proper parents, the trial court granted custody of the children, ages 3V2 and IV2 at the *237 time of trial in September 1988, to the appellee father, subject to visitation in the appellant mother.

We have held that determinations as to the custody of and visitation with minor children in a dissolution of marriage case are matters initially entrusted to the discretion of the trial judge, whose determinations, on appeal, will be reviewed de novo on the record and affirmed in the absence of an abuse of the trial judge’s discretion; keeping in mind, however, that the trial judge observed and heard the witnesses and accepted one version of the facts rather than the other. Shaffer v. Shaffer, 231 Neb. 910, 438 N.W.2d 507 (1989); Griffith v. Griffith, 230 Neb. 314, 431 N.W.2d 609 (1988); Staman v. Staman, 225 Neb. 864, 408 N.W.2d 320 (1987).

We have so reviewed this case. We determine that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion. The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sutter v. Sutter
449 N.W.2d 236 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1989)
Pendergrass v. Pendergrass-Lieto
441 N.W.2d 208 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
439 N.W.2d 796, 232 Neb. 236, 1989 Neb. LEXIS 232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dilsaver-v-dilsaver-neb-1989.