Pendergrass v. Pendergrass-Lieto

441 N.W.2d 208, 232 Neb. 575, 1989 Neb. LEXIS 282
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedJune 16, 1989
DocketNo. 88-762
StatusPublished

This text of 441 N.W.2d 208 (Pendergrass v. Pendergrass-Lieto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pendergrass v. Pendergrass-Lieto, 441 N.W.2d 208, 232 Neb. 575, 1989 Neb. LEXIS 282 (Neb. 1989).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Deborah K. Pendergrass-Lieto appeals the Sarpy County District Court’s order modifying a District of Columbia dissolution decree to grant custody of two of her daughters to their father, Russell Pendergrass.

The parties previously had joint custody of the girls. The modification decree provided for reasonable visitation of the girls with their mother. The District of Columbia decree was registered in the Sarpy County District Court. The court properly obtained jurisdiction of the custody issues under the Nebraska Child Custody Jurisdiction Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 43-1201 to 43-1225 (Reissue 1988).

We have held that determinations as to the custody of and visitation with minor children in a dissolution of marriage case are matters initially entrusted to the discretion of the trial judge, whose determinations, on appeal, will be reviewed de novo on the record and affirmed in the absence of an abuse of the trial [576]*576judge’s discretion; keeping in mind, however, that the trial judge observed and heard the witnesses and accepted one version of the facts rather than the other. Dilsaver v. Dilsaver, ante p. 236, 439 N.W.2d 796 (1989); Shaffer v. Shaffer, 231 Neb. 910, 438 N.W.2d 507 (1989); Griffith v. Griffith, 230 Neb. 314, 431 N.W.2d 609(1988).

We have reviewed the record de novo. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in nullifying the joint custody arrangement and granting the girls’ custody to their father with reasonable rights of visitation in the mother.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shaffer v. Shaffer
438 N.W.2d 507 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1989)
Dilsaver v. Dilsaver
439 N.W.2d 796 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1989)
Griffith v. Griffith
431 N.W.2d 609 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
441 N.W.2d 208, 232 Neb. 575, 1989 Neb. LEXIS 282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pendergrass-v-pendergrass-lieto-neb-1989.