Dickerson, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

255 So. 2d 521, 1971 Fla. LEXIS 3191
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 8, 1971·No. No. 41044·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the writ was improvidently issued. Therefore, the writ is hereby discharged and the petition for writ of certiorari is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur. McCAIN, J., dissents with opinion. ERVIN, J., dissents and concurs with McCAIN, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dickerson, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., 255 So. 2d 521, 1971 Fla. LEXIS 3191 (Fla. 1971).

255 So. 2d 521 (Dickerson, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Family Bank of Hallandale
667 So. 2d 257 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)