Diaz v. State

768 So. 2d 1231, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12702, 2000 WL 1471646
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Diaz v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 747 So. 2d 1021
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 4, 2000·No. No. 3D00-2366·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Avissmael Diaz seeks review of an order 1 denying his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, seeking postconviction relief. We reverse and remand.

The circuit court summarily denied the motion as “legally insufficient” without reaching the merits. Our examination of the petition for posteonvietion relief shows no legal insufficiency. The motion was timely filed, contains appropriate issues for review, supporting facts, memorandum of law, and an unnotarized oath at the conclusion which substantially complies with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.987. See also § 92.525(2), Fla. Stat. (1999); Zipperer v. Singletary, 693 So.2d 122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). We therefore reverse the order summarily denying relief and re[1232]*1232mand for consideration of the postconviction petition on the merits.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Diaz v. State, 768 So. 2d 1231, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 12702, 2000 WL 1471646 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

768 So. 2d 1231 (Diaz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zipperer v. Singletary
693 So. 2d 122 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)