Diaz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Diaz v. State

715 So. 2d 1128, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10768, 1998 WL 484611

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 19, 1998

DocketNo. 98-704

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 715 So. 2d 1128 (Diaz v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Diaz v. State, 715 So. 2d 1128, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10768, 1998 WL 484611 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no merit to appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Flori[1129]*1129da Rules of Criminal Procedure, rules 3.800 and 3.850 and thus, affirm the trial court’s denial of his motions. We agree, however, with the State that appellant’s sentence must be corrected to reflect that his sentences on case numbers 93-30316, 93-33038, and 93-33837 are to run consecutive to his current sentences and accordingly, remand for this purpose.

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We find no merit to appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Flori[1129]*1129da Rules of Criminal Procedure, rules 3.800 and 3.850 and thus, affirm the trial court’s denial of his motions. We agree, however, with the State that appellant’s sentence must be corrected to reflect that his sentences on case numbers 93-30316, 93-33038, and 93-33837 are to run consecutive to his current sentences and accordingly, remand for this purpose.

Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

715 So. 2d 1128, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10768, 1998 WL 484611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diaz-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack