Diaz v. State
715 So. 2d 1128, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10768, 1998 WL 484611
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 19, 1998·No. No. 98-704·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We find no merit to appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Flori[1129]*1129da Rules of Criminal Procedure, rules 3.800 and 3.850 and thus, affirm the trial court’s denial of his motions. We agree, however, with the State that appellant’s sentence must be corrected to reflect that his sentences on case numbers 93-30316, 93-33038, and 93-33837 are to run consecutive to his current sentences and accordingly, remand for this purpose.
Affirmed and remanded with instructions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Diaz v. State, 715 So. 2d 1128, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10768, 1998 WL 484611 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
715 So. 2d 1128 (Diaz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Diaz v. State
804 So. 2d 620 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)