Diamond v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Diamond v. State

46 P.2d 918, 57 Okla. Crim. 219

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 7, 1935

DocketNo. A-8810.

StatusPublished

This text of 46 P.2d 918 (Diamond v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Diamond v. State, 46 P.2d 918, 57 Okla. Crim. 219 (Okla. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a companion case to- No. A-8809, 57 Okla. Cr. 214, 46 Pac. (2d) 966, just decided, involving the same defendant and the same charge except for a different transaction. The same questions are raised, and plaintiff in error’s brief differing from that filed in A-8809 only in referring to page numbers of the record; the state’s brief setting, up no additional matter and referring to its former brief.

Under the rule there laid down, the case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is a companion case to- No. A-8809, 57 Okla. Cr. 214, 46 Pac. (2d) 966, just decided, involving the same defendant and the same charge except for a different transaction. The same questions are raised, and plaintiff in error’s brief differing from that filed in A-8809 only in referring to page numbers of the record; the state’s brief setting, up no additional matter and referring to its former brief.

Under the rule there laid down, the case is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 P.2d 918, 57 Okla. Crim. 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diamond-v-state-oklacrimapp-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack