White v. State

1919 OK CR 40, 177 P. 550, 15 Okla. Crim. 674, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 28
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedFebruary 11, 1919
DocketNo. A-2831.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1919 OK CR 40 (White v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
White v. State, 1919 OK CR 40, 177 P. 550, 15 Okla. Crim. 674, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 28 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an indictment charging that George White did keep a place in the city of Muskogee, known as the “Peerless .Drug Store,” with the intent and purpose of selling intoxicating liquors. On his trial the jury rendered a verdict of guilty, and fixed his punishment at confinement in the county jail for 30 days and a fine of $300. To reverse the judgment rendered on the verdict an appeal was perfected.

This is a prosecution under section 4, c. 26 Session Laws 1913, which provision of the statute was in the case of Proctor v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 338, 176 Pac. 771, held unconstitutional and void. Por the reasons státed in the opinion of the Proctor Case, the judgment is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Diamond v. State
46 P.2d 966 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1919 OK CR 40, 177 P. 550, 15 Okla. Crim. 674, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 28, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/white-v-state-oklacrimapp-1919.