White v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

White v. State

1919 OK CR 40, 177 P. 550, 15 Okla. Crim. 674, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 28

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided February 11, 1919·No. No. A-2831.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an indictment charging that George White did keep a place in the city of Muskogee, known as the “Peerless .Drug Store,” with the intent and purpose of selling intoxicating liquors. On his trial the jury rendered a verdict of guilty, and fixed his punishment at confinement in the county jail for 30 days and a fine of $300. To reverse the judgment rendered on the verdict an appeal was perfected.

This is a prosecution under section 4, c. 26 Session Laws 1913, which provision of the statute was in the case of Proctor v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 338, 176 Pac. 771, held unconstitutional and void. Por the reasons státed in the opinion of the Proctor Case, the judgment is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an indictment charging that George White did keep a place in the city of Muskogee, known as the “Peerless .Drug Store,” with the intent and purpose of selling intoxicating liquors. On his trial the jury rendered a verdict of guilty, and fixed his punishment at confinement in the county jail for 30 days and a fine of $300. To reverse the judgment rendered on the verdict an appeal was perfected.

This is a prosecution under section 4, c. 26 Session Laws 1913, which provision of the statute was in the case of Proctor v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 338, 176 Pac. 771, held unconstitutional and void. Por the reasons státed in the opinion of the Proctor Case, the judgment is reversed.

White v. State, 1919 OK CR 40, 177 P. 550, 15 Okla. Crim. 674, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 28 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

1919 OK CR 40 (White v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related