Diamond Shamrock Corp. v. Ortiz

753 S.W.2d 238, 1988 Tex. App. LEXIS 1420, 1988 WL 60341
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 16, 1988
Docket13-87-328-CV
StatusPublished
Cited by33 cases

This text of 753 S.W.2d 238 (Diamond Shamrock Corp. v. Ortiz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Diamond Shamrock Corp. v. Ortiz, 753 S.W.2d 238, 1988 Tex. App. LEXIS 1420, 1988 WL 60341 (Tex. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

OPINION

KENNEDY, Justice.

Diamond Shamrock Corporation [Shamrock] and Industrial Lubricants, Inc., a subsidiary thereof, appeal from a judgment rendered against them for $50,000, for the malicious prosecution of Reynaldo Ortiz. Appellants bring five no evidence points of error, a point on pre-judgment interest, and a point on excessive damages. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.

In 1981, appellee was hired by Richard Johnson, a district manager for Shamrock, to work in a La Feria warehouse for Industrial Lubricants, Inc. Appellee first worked installing racks and cleaning the warehouse, then worked as a truck driver delivering oil and lubricants stored there, and finally moved back in the warehouse preparing orders for shipment. In 1983, appellee, Alex Jimenez and Chuck Danek worked together preparing orders for shipment under the supervision of Dan Savari-no. Savarino worked in an office adjoining the bay area, along with his secretaries, Rosi Trevino and Estella Elizonda. Johnson worked in Corpus Christi and visited the La Feria warehouse once a month to supervise an inventory of the stock. Ap-pellee's cousin, Arnold Ortiz, worked as a truck driver for the warehouse.

It was Savarino’s policy to sell damaged warehouse merchandise to the employees at a discount. Appellee purchased merchandise by check every two or three weeks and either took it home in his car or let his cousin Arnold transport it for him on Arnold’s truck.

Sometime in 1983, Trevino found an invoice in her files that had originally indicated the sale of an oil drum, but had been altered to reflect the sale of a less expensive item. She called Johnson, who came down to investigate the discrepancy. Sa-varino,. who had actually been responsible for altering the invoice, managed to convince Johnson that Elizonda, who had recently been terminated, was responsible, and the investigation was temporarily suspended. Savarino, however, resigned from the company. Johnson then instructed Trevino to look for other altered invoices. When Trevino discovered ten such invoices, reflecting close to $1,000 unaccounted for, Johnson resumed his investigation of the La Feria warehouse.

This time Johnson and Joseph O’Connell, an investigator employed by Shamrock, visited the La Feria warehouse on a Tuesday and began to question the employees one by one in the office. When appellee was questioned, Johnson got angry, accused him of stealing and cussed him. Johnson and O’Connell questioned several other employees who gave them statements implicating the appellee and Jiminez in theft. Arnold Ortiz gave a statement that:

I know that Ray Ortiz and Alex Jimi-nez put extra merchandise on my truck. I take the merchandise which is company property to my house and I then sell it off to my friends and neighbors. I keep half of the money and I give the other half to Ray and Alex. This has been going on for about one and one half *240 years, (1½) or since Alex Jiminez came to work for the company.

In addition, three other truck drivers for the warehouse gave the following statements to Johnson and O’Connell:

Roger Cortez
I recall telling Dan Savarino, the former warehouse manager, that merchandise was being stolen from the warehouse and he told me that was the American way, and that it happens in every company. I also recall seeing Alex Jimenez throw a box over the fence that I believe contained spark-plugs. This was maybe nine months to a year ago.
Extra merchandise has been put on my truck, but I always bring it back. Ray Ortiz and Alex would try to get me to keep it off the truck so they could sell it, but I have refused to do this.
Marcus Castro
I saw Ray Ortiz in the spark plug room stuffing Chamois down the inside front of his pants. I reported this to Mr. Dan Savarino the manager at the time.
[[Image here]]
Ray Ortiz approached me and asked to add a case of Sealbeams to my load, because he knew he would be riding with me that day to help unload. I refused.
Raymond Perez
For the past two to two and one half (2⅛) years I have seen merchandise being taken illegally from the warehouse. Arnold Ortiz, a truck driver and his coun-sin Ray Ortiz, a warehouseman and one other individual who help load the trucks are involved. This person is Alex Jimenez who is also a warehouseman.
[[Image here]]
The merchandise is taken by these men from the shelfs in the warehouse and put on the pallets after the manifest is written and after the manager has checked off the merchandise. After the stolen merchandise is loaded on the truck it would be dropped off at various locations. One spot I know of was Shorty’s Diamond Shamrock station in Pharr. I also know that Ray Ortiz stole a two wheel truck from the warehouse that he sold to drivers that frequent Shorty’s. I also know these men would throw spark plugs they stole over the warehouse fence and pick them up later.
[[Image here]]
I also recall seeing Ray Ortiz putting chamois into the front of his pants that he had stole [sic] from the warehouse.

Later Tuesday evening, Arnold Ortiz and his wife asked to meet with Johnson and O’Connell to talk about the investigation. They agreed to get together for drinks at the hotel where Johnson and O’Connell were staying. Arnold Ortiz then explained to them that appellee and Jimenez hadn’t stolen the goods put on his truck, but had bought them from Savarino as damaged merchandise.

The next day, Johnson and O’Connell turned the statements over to the La Feria police department and repeatedly called the police to discuss what would be done about the situation. That afternoon, Officer Estrada came to the warehouse office. Ap-pellee and Jimenez were called to the office and Estrada took them down to the police station for questioning. They were later arrested after Estrada filed a complaint against them for felony theft on the basis of Arnold Ortiz’ statement against them. Shortly thereafter, Arnold Ortiz was also arrested for felony theft.

Several weeks later, an examining trial was held before Justice of the Peace Henry Dierks to determine if there was probable cause to hold appellee for felony theft. Johnson, Cortez and Castro testified against appellee at the examining trial. Johnson, knowing that Savarino had been responsible for the loss of the oil drum, testified that the drum and a number of other items were missing from the La Fe-ria warehouse. Then, after the prosecutor asked if he had ever given appellee, Jimenez or Arnold permission to take this property, Johnson replied “no,” without elaborating upon his knowledge that Savarino had taken the oil drum. Justice Dierks found probable cause. Shortly after the *241 examining trial, however, the district attorney declined to prosecute the case because of insufficient evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kroger Texas Ltd. Partnership v. Suberu
216 S.W.3d 788 (Texas Supreme Court, 2006)
JC Penney Co., Inc. v. Ruth
982 S.W.2d 586 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Richey v. Brookshire Grocery Co.
952 S.W.2d 515 (Texas Supreme Court, 1997)
Smith v. Sneed
938 S.W.2d 181 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1997)
ITT Consumer Financial Corp. v. Tovar
932 S.W.2d 147 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1996)
Ellis County State Bank v. Keever
913 S.W.2d 605 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)
Carr v. Mobile Video Tapes, Inc.
893 S.W.2d 613 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)
Coastal Barge Corp. v. M/V Maritime Prosperity
901 F. Supp. 325 (M.D. Florida, 1994)
Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc. v. Lieck
881 S.W.2d 288 (Texas Supreme Court, 1994)
Ellis County State Bank v. Keever
888 S.W.2d 790 (Texas Supreme Court, 1994)
Chandler v. United States
875 F. Supp. 1250 (N.D. Texas, 1994)
Kjellvander v. Citicorp
156 F.R.D. 138 (S.D. Texas, 1994)
Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc. v. Lieck
845 S.W.2d 926 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1993)
Martin v. Thomas
Fifth Circuit, 1992
Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc. v. Zavaleta
827 S.W.2d 336 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
753 S.W.2d 238, 1988 Tex. App. LEXIS 1420, 1988 WL 60341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diamond-shamrock-corp-v-ortiz-texapp-1988.