Devoe v. Ithaca & Owego Rail Road

5 Paige Ch. 521, 1835 N.Y. LEXIS 234, 1835 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 94
New York Court of Chancery·Decided December 22, 1835·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

The Chancellor

decided that a sequestration ought not to be granted, or a receiver appointed ex parte, and without giving the corporation an opportunity to be heard. But upon filing of the petition, duly verified, showing the recovery of a-judgment against the corporation, and that the execution issu-' ed thereon to the proper county had been returned by the sheriff unsatisfied, the court directed an order to show cause, at a future day, why the prayer of the petition should not be granted; and that a copy of the petition and order should be served upon the proper officers of the corporation the usual time before the day appointed for showing cause. And that in the mean time the officers of the company be restrained,by injunction, from selling, assigning, transferring,- or encumbering the property or effects of the corporation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Devoe v. Ithaca & Owego Rail Road, 5 Paige Ch. 521, 1835 N.Y. LEXIS 234, 1835 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 94 (N.Y. 1835).

5 Paige Ch. 521 (Devoe v. Ithaca & Owego Rail Road) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Howell v. Wildes
34 Nev. 94 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1911)
Golden v. Fifth Judicial District Court
31 Nev. 250 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1909)
Gilbert v. Block
51 Ill. App. 516 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1894)
People v. . O'Brien
18 N.E. 692 (New York Court of Appeals, 1888)
Ramsey v. Gould
38 How. Pr. 206 (New York Supreme Court, 1869)
Bangs v. McIntosh
23 Barb. 591 (New York Supreme Court, 1857)
Grew v. Breed
53 Mass. 363 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1847)
Mann v. Pentz
2 Sand. Ch. 257 (New York Court of Chancery, 1845)