Desrosiers v. State

189 So. 2d 834
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 23, 1966·No. No. H—311·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant filed a motion pursuant to Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A., Ch. 924 Appendix, the trial court denied the relief requested and appeal was taken from such denial. The sentence imposed for the judgment of conviction under attack has been served, thus making the matter moot. Therefore, the appeal is hereby dismissed upon the authority of Young v. State, 167 So.2d 622 (Fla.App. 1st, 1964).

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SACK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Desrosiers v. State, 189 So. 2d 834 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

189 So. 2d 834 (Desrosiers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Woods v. State
214 So. 3d 803 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
State v. Barber
301 So. 2d 7 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1974)
North v. State
217 So. 2d 608 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Wingard v. State
210 So. 2d 472 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)