Wingard v. State

210 So. 2d 472, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5570
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 17, 1968·No. No. 68-25·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner is appealing from the summary denial of his Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1 motion. In order to obtain post-conviction relief under Rule No. 1 (now R.Cr.P. 1.850, 33 F.S.A.), it is necessary that one seeking such relief be in custody by virtue of the sentence appealed from. An appeal from a judgment denying a motion for post-conviction relief under Rule No. 1 becomes moot upon completion of the service of the sentence. Desrosiers v. State, Fla.App.1966, 189 So.2d 834; Smith v. State, Fla.App.1965, 175 So.2d 243; Young v. State, Fla.App.1964, 167 So.2d 622. It appears from the record that the sentence appealed from has already expired. Accordingly, petitioner’s appeal must be dismissed.

LILES, C. J., and ALLEN and PIERCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wingard v. State, 210 So. 2d 472, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5570 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

210 So. 2d 472 (Wingard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Simmons v. State
489 So. 2d 43 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Henzel v. State
390 So. 2d 397 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Wilcox v. State
267 So. 2d 15 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)
Williams v. State
227 So. 2d 337 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)