Home/Supreme Court/DeSeyn v. Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District

DeSeyn v. Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District

471 U.S. 1101, 105 S. Ct. 2326, 85 L. Ed. 2d 844, 53 U.S.L.W. 3807, 1985 U.S. LEXIS 1794
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 13, 1985
DocketNo. 84-1468
StatusPublished
Cited by29 cases

This text of 471 U.S. 1101 (DeSeyn v. Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DeSeyn v. Muskingum Watershed Conservancy District, 471 U.S. 1101, 105 S. Ct. 2326, 85 L. Ed. 2d 844, 53 U.S.L.W. 3807, 1985 U.S. LEXIS 1794 (1985).

Opinion

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Crowley
2014 UT App 33 (Court of Appeals of Utah, 2014)
Gibson v. Bray
43 F. Supp. 2d 1375 (N.D. Georgia, 1998)
Johnson v. Waters
970 F. Supp. 991 (M.D. Alabama, 1997)
Coleman v. Alcolac, Inc.
888 F. Supp. 1388 (S.D. Texas, 1995)
Sheppard v. Beerman
822 F. Supp. 931 (E.D. New York, 1993)
Stewart v. State
601 So. 2d 491 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1992)
Cuban Museum of Arts & Culture, Inc. v. City of Miami
766 F. Supp. 1121 (S.D. Florida, 1991)
Stena Rederi Ab v. Comision Contratos Comite Ejecutivo General Sindicato Revolucionario Trabajadores Petroleros
923 F.2d 380 (Fifth Circuit, 1991)
Stena Rederi AB v. Comision de Contratos del Comite Ejecutivo General del Sindicato Revolucionario de Trabajadores Petroleros de la Republica Mexicana, S.C.
923 F.2d 380 (Fifth Circuit, 1991)
Johnsen v. Independent School District No. 3
891 F.2d 1485 (Tenth Circuit, 1989)
Johnsen v. Independent School District No. 3 Of Tulsa County
891 F.2d 1485 (Tenth Circuit, 1989)
Leonard Finch, Cross-Appellant v. City of Vernon, Etc., Cross-Appellee, Clark Rogers, J.C. Armstrong, Jr., Coleman Armstrong, Cross-Appellees. John A. Reddick, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Rubert D. Reddick, Deceased, Cross-Appellant v. City of Vernon, Etc., Cross-Appellees, Harrell Sapp, Etc., J.C. Armstrong, Jr., Coleman Armstrong, Cross-Appellees. Leonard Finch, Cross-Appellant v. The City of Vernon, Cross-Appellee, Clark Rogers, J.C. Armstrong, Jr., John A. Reddick, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Rubert D. Reddick, Deceased v. The City of Vernon, J.C. Armstrong, Jr., Coleman Armstrong
877 F.2d 1497 (Eleventh Circuit, 1989)
Finch v. City of Vernon
877 F.2d 1497 (Eleventh Circuit, 1989)
Security Pacific National Bank v. Derderian
872 F.2d 281 (Ninth Circuit, 1989)
Kurtz v. Vickrey
855 F.2d 723 (Eleventh Circuit, 1988)
Four Corners Helicopters, Inc. v. Turbomeca S.A.
677 F. Supp. 1096 (D. Colorado, 1988)
Clayton Palmer v. Richard L. Dugger, Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Respondents
833 F.2d 253 (Eleventh Circuit, 1987)
Nicholson v. Gant
816 F.2d 591 (Eleventh Circuit, 1987)
Nicholson v. Gant, II
816 F.2d 591 (Eleventh Circuit, 1987)
Vivian Hatcher v. Board of Public Education and Orphanage for Bibb County
809 F.2d 1546 (Eleventh Circuit, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
471 U.S. 1101, 105 S. Ct. 2326, 85 L. Ed. 2d 844, 53 U.S.L.W. 3807, 1985 U.S. LEXIS 1794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deseyn-v-muskingum-watershed-conservancy-district-scotus-1985.