Demby v. Plischke

38 So. 2d 266, 1949 La. App. LEXIS 384
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJanuary 6, 1949
DocketNo. 7268.
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 38 So. 2d 266 (Demby v. Plischke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Demby v. Plischke, 38 So. 2d 266, 1949 La. App. LEXIS 384 (La. Ct. App. 1949).

Opinion

Henry Demby on July 16, 1946, was injured while driving on Oldsmobile sedan owned by his employer, Consolidated Companies, Inc. Alleging that the collision occurred through the negligent operation of a pick-up truck operated by defendant, Edward J. Plischke, owned by defendant Midwest Dairy Products Corporation and insured by defendant Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Demby filed suit for $2,836 damages against the three named defendants.

Demby's petition set forth that while proceeding in the direction of Alexandria, Louisiana on the Marksville-Alexandria highway, and after he had safely passed a Dodge sedan (driven by a Mrs. Allen) and returned to his right lane of the highway, a pick-up truck operated by defendant Plischke was approaching from the opposite direction; that this truck left its right lane and drove partly on the right shoulder, then sharply turned left and angularly across the highway into Demby's lane of traffic; that despite the fact that plaintiff turned the Oldsmobile to the right and partly upon the shoulder and despite the prompt application of the brakes for a distance of about ninety feet, the truck ran into the left front of the Oldsmobile, completely demolishing same and injuring plaintiff and the other occupant of the car. The specific acts of negligence charged against Plischke were that he failed to keep a proper lookout; that he failed to reduce his speed; that he negligently drove the truck on to the shoulder of the road and negligently cut back sharply and failed to keep the truck under control.

The three defendants answered, admitting the happening of the collision, but set forth that the collision was caused solely by the negligence of the plaintiff. The defendants specifically charged that plaintiff, while traveling west at a speed of at least seventy miles an hour, suddenly cut out to his left and from behind a cream colored car (the Dodge driven by Mrs. Allen) at a time when defendant Plischke was so near that a head-on collision was inevitable; *Page 267 that in this emergency Plischke pulled to the right shoulder, losing control of the truck, which veered back on to the paved portion where it was struck by plaintiff's Oldsmobile sedan. In the alternative, in the event the Court should hold defendant Plischke negligent, defendants pleaded that the above acts of the plaintiff constituted contributory negligence and pleaded same as a bar to his recovery.

Victor J. Kurzweg, who was president of the corporation employing Demby and the only passenger in the Oldsmobile, for which plaintiff Demby was chauffeur, filed a separate suit against Plischke, his employer and its insurer.

The American Automobile Insurance Company, as subrogee under its insurance policy covering the Oldsmobile driven by Demby and as compensation carrier for Demby's employer, also filed suit against Plischke, his employer and its insurer.

Edward J. Plischke, driver of the pick-up truck, who was injured in the collision, filed suit for damages against the Consolidated Companies, Inc. (owner of the Oldsmobile), Victor J. Kurzweg, who was in charge of the Oldsmobile at the time of the collision, and the American Automobile Insurance Company, carrier of insurance on the Oldsmobile.

The Midwest Dairy Products Company filed suit against the same defendants asking for judgment for the damage done to the pick-up truck and its contents.

The five suits were consolidated for trial.

The District Court, in a lengthy and well considered written opinion, found that defendant Plischke was guilty of negligence in operating his truck at an excessive speed, and in failing to check this speed and in erroneously assuming that the circumstances required him to drive his truck off the pavement, and in failing to keep his truck under control, and rendered judgment in favor of Demby, the chauffeur of the Oldsmobile, Victor J. Kurzweg, passenger in the Oldsmobile, and the American Automobile Insurance Company, carrier of public liability insurance on the Oldsmobile and of compensation insurance on its passengers, and rejected the demands of Plischke, driver of the pick-up truck, and of Midwest Dairy Products Company, owner of the truck and employer of Plischke.

The five cases were consolidated for argument in this Court for the reason that a decision in each and all of the cases can be reached once it is decided whether the collision was caused through the negligence of the driver of the Oldsmobile sedan in passing the Allen Dodge while in too close proximity to the on-coming Plischke pick-up truck, or whether the collision resulted from the negligence of Plischke in unnecessarily driving his fast moving pick-up truck on to his right shoulder and suddenly veering same into the path of the Oldsmobile after it had successfully passed the Allen Dodge and was traveling in its own lane of traffic.

Plischke, driver of the pick-up truck, testified that he was traveling at forty miles per hour and approaching an elevation, which obstructed his view on the other side of the crest; that he was meeting the Allen Dodge when the Oldsmobile "darted right out at me;" that he yanked his car to the right to avoid a head-on collision and "because I was scared it would turn over," he turned back to the left and the two cars collided. He testified positively that he was "fully on the (his) right side of the road" and that over three-fourths of the approaching Oldsmobile was in the pick-up truck's lane of traffic. He further testified that had he continued in his own lane that "we (the Oldsmobile and the pick-up) would have hit properly head-on in the lane of traffic we were driving in."

Demby, driver of the Oldsmobile, testified that he had passed the Allen Dodge going in the same direction as the Oldsmobile, and noticed the pick-up truck going off the highway on its right side and cutting sharply back on to the highway; that he immediately applied brakes and started pulling off the highway so as to give the pick-up as much room as he possibly could to straighten up, and that the right side of the pick-up truck struck the left front and side of the Oldsmobile car which was, at that time, partly off the pavement on its right side of the highway. *Page 268

The testimony of Plischke was supported by that of the two ladies on the front seat of the Allen Dodge, who testified that the pick-up was only twenty-five feet in front of their Dodge when the Oldsmobile began passing the Dodge, and by Mr. Franklin, manager of the company which owned the pick-up, who testified that from the position of the debris and broken glass, etc., the accident must have happened "on Plischke's right side of the road."

Demby's description of the accident was substantiated by the testimony of Mr. Kurzweg, one of the parties to the suit, who was the passenger in the Oldsmobile, who said he heard Demby blow his horn prior to passing the Allen Dodge, and, feeling the brakes go on a few minutes later, he looked up and saw the approaching pickup "shimmying or wobbling with two wheels on the shoulder" and saw it cross over to its left side of the road and strike the Oldsmobile between the center of the hood and the left wheel and that the impact of the truck swung the truck around so that its left rear end hit the left rear door of the Oldsmobile, causing the pick-up to turn over on its side.

We are greatly assisted in deciding between the conflicting versions of the accident by the testimony of State Trooper McCollum and of Mr. Albert Laborde, in front of whose home the collision occurred. McCollum arrived soon after the collision, and, immediately after taking Mr. Plischke to the near by Marksville Clinic, he returned and made a detailed on-the-spot investigation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hopkins v. State ex rel. Department of Highways
167 So. 2d 441 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1964)
Am. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Midwest Dairy Products Corp.
38 So. 2d 270 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1949)
Plischke v. Consolidated Companies
38 So. 2d 271 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1949)
Midwest Dairy Products Co. v. Consolidated Companies
38 So. 2d 271 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1949)
Kurzweg v. Plischke
38 So. 2d 270 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 So. 2d 266, 1949 La. App. LEXIS 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/demby-v-plischke-lactapp-1949.