DeJesus v. Tapia

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided September 4, 2024·No. 1:24-cv-06448·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ALEX DEJESUS, Plaintiff, 24-CV-6448 (LTS) -against- ORDER DIRECTING IFP P.O. TAPIA-RODGRIGUEZ #972479, NEW APPLICATION AND SIGNATURE YORK CITY POLICE DEPT. -7TH PRECINCT, Defendant. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: Plaintiff brings this action pro se. To proceed with a civil action in this Court, a plaintiff must either pay $405.00 in fees – a $350.00 filing fee plus a $55.00 administrative fee – or, to request authorization to proceed without prepayment of fees, submit a signed application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP application”). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. In addition, Rule 11(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that “[e]very pleading, written motion, and other paper must be signed . . . by a party personally if the party is unrepresented.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a); see Becker v. Montgomery, 532 U.S. 757, 764 (2001) (interpreting Rule 11(a) to require, “as it did in John Hancock’s day, a name handwritten (or a mark handplaced)”).1 Plaintiff submitted his complaint without paying the fee or submitting a signed IFP application. In addition, the complaint that Plaintiff submitted is unsigned.

1 Although a “typed name” does not satisfy Rule 11(a)’s signature requirement, the Supreme Court affirmed the right of courts “by local rule [to] permit papers to be filed, signed, or verified by electronic means.” Becker, 532 U.S. at 764. Under this court’s local rules, where a document is filed in accordance with the SDNY Electronic Case Filing (“ECF”) Rules & Instructions (“ECF Rules”), the filing complies with the local rules. See Local Civil Rule 5.2. Rule 1.1 and Appendix C of the ECF Rules authorize self-represented parties to sign documents submitted to the court by email using an electronic signature or typed name with /s. Accordingly, within 30 days from the date of this order, Plaintiff must: (1) either pay the $405.00 in fees or submit a completed and signed IFP application; and (2) sign and submit the attached signature page. If Plaintiff returns the signed documents by mail or in person, they must have a handwritten signature that complies with Rule 11(a). If Plaintiff submits the documents by

email, to ProSe@nysd.uscourts.gov, Plaintiff may use instead an electronic signature or a typed name with /s/ (“/s/ John Doe”) on the signature line. The signed documents must be labeled with the docket number 24-CV- 6448 (LTS).2 No summons or answer shall issue at this time. If Plaintiff complies with this order, the case shall be processed in accordance with the procedures of the Clerk’s Office. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order within the time allowed, the action will be dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444–45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue).

SO ORDERED. Dated: September 4, 2024 New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

2 For registered ECF filers, “[t]he user log-in and password required to submit documents to the ECF system serve as the Filing User’s signature on all electronic documents filed with the Court.” Rule 8.1 of the SDNY ECF Rules & Instructions. Self-represented litigants must request permission to register for ECF by filing a Motion for Permission for Electronic Case Filing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DeJesus v. Tapia, (S.D.N.Y. 2024).

DeJesus v. Tapia (DeJesus v. Tapia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)
Becker v. Montgomery
532 U.S. 757 (Supreme Court, 2001)