Decker v. Decker
426 N.W.2d 533, 229 Neb. 347, 1988 Neb. LEXIS 268
Opinion
This is a dissolution action in which the petitioner-appellant wife, Sandra R. Decker, claims the trial court’s division of marital assets was unreasonable, the award of alimony was insufficient, and the award of attorney fees was inadequate. We have reviewed the trial court’s judgment de novo on the record and determined that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in either the division of those assets or in its award of alimony and attorney fees. Accordingly, the decree of the trial court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Decker v. Decker, 426 N.W.2d 533, 229 Neb. 347, 1988 Neb. LEXIS 268 (Neb. 1988).
426 N.W.2d 533 (Decker v. Decker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Shada v. Shada
442 N.W.2d 386 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1989)
Strong v. Strong
439 N.W.2d 90 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1989)
Mausbach v. Mausbach
435 N.W.2d 914 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1989)