Decker v. Decker

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decker v. Decker

426 N.W.2d 533, 229 Neb. 347, 1988 Neb. LEXIS 268

CourtNebraska Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 29, 1988

Docket87-077

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 426 N.W.2d 533 (Decker v. Decker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Decker v. Decker, 426 N.W.2d 533, 229 Neb. 347, 1988 Neb. LEXIS 268 (Neb. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a dissolution action in which the petitioner-appellant wife, Sandra R. Decker, claims the trial court’s division of marital assets was unreasonable, the award of alimony was insufficient, and the award of attorney fees was inadequate. We have reviewed the trial court’s judgment de novo on the record and determined that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in either the division of those assets or in its award of alimony and attorney fees. Accordingly, the decree of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is a dissolution action in which the petitioner-appellant wife, Sandra R. Decker, claims the trial court’s division of marital assets was unreasonable, the award of alimony was insufficient, and the award of attorney fees was inadequate. We have reviewed the trial court’s judgment de novo on the record and determined that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in either the division of those assets or in its award of alimony and attorney fees. Accordingly, the decree of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

426 N.W.2d 533, 229 Neb. 347, 1988 Neb. LEXIS 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/decker-v-decker-neb-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack