Strong v. Strong

439 N.W.2d 90, 232 Neb. 25, 1989 Neb. LEXIS 203
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedMay 5, 1989
Docket87-637
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 439 N.W.2d 90 (Strong v. Strong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Strong v. Strong, 439 N.W.2d 90, 232 Neb. 25, 1989 Neb. LEXIS 203 (Neb. 1989).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petitioner, Delores I. Strong, appeals the division of property and debts and the determination of alimony as *26 decreed by the trial court in this proceeding.

As required in cases of this nature, we have reviewed the record de novo to determine whether the district court abused its discretion in dividing the property and debts, and in awarding alimony. Decker v. Decker, 229 Neb. 347, 426 N.W.2d 533 (1988).

We determine that there was no abuse of discretion by the trial court with respect to the issues raised. Accordingly, the decree of the trial court is affirmed. The request of appellant for the allowance of attorney fees is denied.

We deem it appropriate to note that appellant requests this court to consider the effect of possible bankruptcy proceedings and results therefrom, with respect to the division of property and debts. No evidence with respect thereto was shown at trial, and we decline to enter into speculation with respect to the same.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shada v. Shada
442 N.W.2d 386 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
439 N.W.2d 90, 232 Neb. 25, 1989 Neb. LEXIS 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/strong-v-strong-neb-1989.