Mausbach v. Mausbach

435 N.W.2d 914, 231 Neb. 280, 1989 Neb. LEXIS 73
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 24, 1989
DocketNo. 87-150
StatusPublished

This text of 435 N.W.2d 914 (Mausbach v. Mausbach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mausbach v. Mausbach, 435 N.W.2d 914, 231 Neb. 280, 1989 Neb. LEXIS 73 (Neb. 1989).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petitioner, Eugene L. Mausbach, appeals the division of property, alimony order, and allowance of an attorney fee in this dissolution proceeding.

As required in cases of this nature, we have reviewed the record de novo to determine whether the district court abused its discretion in dividing the property, granting an amount of alimony, and allowing an attorney fee. See Decker v. Decker, 229 Neb. 347, 426 N.W.2d 533 (1988).

We determine that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in either the division of assets or its award of alimony and attorney fee. Accordingly, the decree of the trial court is affirmed. The request for attorney fees in this court is denied.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Decker v. Decker
426 N.W.2d 533 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
435 N.W.2d 914, 231 Neb. 280, 1989 Neb. LEXIS 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mausbach-v-mausbach-neb-1989.