Day v. State
531 So. 2d 426, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2239, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4385, 1988 WL 99514
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 29, 1988·No. No. 87-1515·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Day appeals from convictions for petit theft and dealing in stolen property. Pursuant to Alexander v. State, 470 So.2d 856 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985) and Ridley v. State, 407 So.2d 1000 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981), the conviction for petit theft is vacated and we remand for correction of the judgment and scoresheet. The case is in all other respects affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Day v. State, 531 So. 2d 426, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2239, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4385, 1988 WL 99514 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
531 So. 2d 426 (Day v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Blackmon v. State
58 So. 3d 343 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Schummer v. State
657 So. 2d 3 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)