Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Day v. State

Day v. State

496 So. 2d 986, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2329, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10399
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 5, 1986
DocketNo. BL-197
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 496 So. 2d 986 (Day v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Day v. State, 496 So. 2d 986, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2329, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10399 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

WIGGINTON, Judge.

Appellant brings this appeal from a sentence imposing court costs as a condition of probation pursuant to section 27.3455, Flor[987]*987ida Statutes (1985). Implicitly conceding error, the State suggests that we resolve this issue in conformity with our holding in Lawton v. State, 492 So.2d 404 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). We agree with the State’s suggestion. Accordingly, we reverse the imposition of court costs on appellant and remand for further action in accordance with Lawton, including a hearing on the issue of indigency, pursuant to notice, and the issuance of appropriate orders thereon.

ERVIN and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Helms v. State
499 So. 2d 46 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Grimes v. State
499 So. 2d 42 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
496 So. 2d 986, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2329, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/day-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.