Day v. State
531 So. 2d 426, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2239, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4385, 1988 WL 99514
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 29, 1988
DocketNo. 87-1515
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 531 So. 2d 426 (Day v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Day v. State, 531 So. 2d 426, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2239, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4385, 1988 WL 99514 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
Opinion
Day appeals from convictions for petit theft and dealing in stolen property. Pursuant to Alexander v. State, 470 So.2d 856 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985) and Ridley v. State, 407 So.2d 1000 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981), the conviction for petit theft is vacated and we remand for correction of the judgment and scoresheet. The case is in all other respects affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Blackmon v. State
58 So. 3d 343 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Schummer v. State
657 So. 2d 3 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
531 So. 2d 426, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2239, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 4385, 1988 WL 99514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/day-v-state-fladistctapp-1988.