Davis v. State
331 S.W.3d 723, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 226, 2011 WL 590364
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1226 →
Opinion
Norman Davis, Jr. (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing. The motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value and we affirm by written order. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. State, 331 S.W.3d 723, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 226, 2011 WL 590364 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
331 S.W.3d 723 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nevettie v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
331 S.W.3d 723 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)