Davis v. State

266 S.W.3d 888, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1586, 2008 WL 4707486
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 28, 2008·No. ED 90535·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, DeLarcie Davis, appeals the denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

The motion court’s order and judgment denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. State, 266 S.W.3d 888, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1586, 2008 WL 4707486 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

266 S.W.3d 888 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Aldein v. Mid-Continental Quality Autos, Inc.
266 S.W.3d 888 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)