Davis v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Davis v. State

277 S.W.3d 342, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 166, 2009 WL 364889

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 17, 2009·No. WD 69369·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Deandre Davis was convicted by a jury of two counts of robbery in the first degree and two counts of armed criminal action. He was sentenced to two concurrent twenty-year terms of imprisonment for robbery and two concurrent ten-year terms of imprisonment for armed criminal action. Mr. Davis appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Deandre Davis was convicted by a jury of two counts of robbery in the first degree and two counts of armed criminal action. He was sentenced to two concurrent twenty-year terms of imprisonment for robbery and two concurrent ten-year terms of imprisonment for armed criminal action. Mr. Davis appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Davis v. State, 277 S.W.3d 342, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 166, 2009 WL 364889 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

277 S.W.3d 342 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related