State v. NEWBILL

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. NEWBILL

277 S.W.3d 342, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 148, 2009 WL 364963

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 17, 2009

DocketWD 69469

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 277 S.W.3d 342 (State v. NEWBILL) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. NEWBILL, 277 S.W.3d 342, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 148, 2009 WL 364963 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM:

Dante Newbill appeals his conviction for misdemeanor driving while intoxicated and sentence as a prior felony offender to a term of six months imprisonment.

Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM:

Dante Newbill appeals his conviction for misdemeanor driving while intoxicated and sentence as a prior felony offender to a term of six months imprisonment.

Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 S.W.3d 342, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 148, 2009 WL 364963, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-newbill-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack