Davis v. State
96 So. 3d 477, 2012 WL 3870859, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14896
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 16843 →
Opinion
The appellant filed a rule 3.850 postcon-viction motion containing four claims which the trial court denied. We affirm the order denying relief and note that claim four involves a challenge pursuant to Shelton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, 802 F.Supp.2d 1289 (M.D.Fla.2011). The Florida Supreme Court has since held that section 893.13, Florida Statutes, is not unconstitutional. See State v. Adkins, 96 So.3d 412 (Fla.2012). We therefore affirm.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. State, 96 So. 3d 477, 2012 WL 3870859, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14896 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).
96 So. 3d 477 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Adkins
96 So. 3d 412 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2012)
Shelton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
802 F. Supp. 2d 1289 (M.D. Florida, 2011)