Davis v. State

765 So. 2d 258, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10258, 2000 WL 1133056
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 11, 2000·No. No. 5D00-1860·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

THOMPSON, C.J.

Phyllis E. Davis appeals from the summary denial of her motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). She sought relief based on Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000). We affirm.

Davis’ motion does not adequately set forth a basis for relief because she has failed to allege that the sentence imposed could not have been imposed under the 1994 guidelines. See Parker v. State, 767 So.2d 532 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s order, but without prejudice to Davis’ refiling a facially sufficient rule 3.800(a) motion.

AFFIRMED.

PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. State, 765 So. 2d 258, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 10258, 2000 WL 1133056 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

765 So. 2d 258 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vaughan v. State
769 So. 2d 530 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Leggett v. Moore
765 So. 2d 258 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)