Davis v. State

700 So. 2d 92, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11199, 1997 WL 606473

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 648 So. 2d 1249 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 3, 1997·No. No. 96-03006·Published

Opinion

FRANK, Judge.

Michelle D. Davis appeals from her judgments and sentences in Case Nos. 95-4390A1-XX and 95-3023A1-XX. We affirm the judgments and sentences, but strike from each case certain conditions of probation and costs.

We strike that portion of condition (20) found in each judgment requiring Davis to pay for evaluation and treatment. See Curry v. State, 682 So.2d 1091 (Fla.1996). We also strike the discretionary fine imposed pursuant to section 775.083, Florida Statutes (1993), in each case because it was not pro[93]*93nounced at sentencing. See Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

Finally, in Case No. 95-3023A1-XX, we strike the $200 costs because that assessment was not part of the plea agreement. See Rivers v. State, 680 So.2d 495 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

Affirmed; certain conditions of probation and costs are stricken.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PATTERSON, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FRANK, Judge.

Finally, in Case No. 95-3023A1-XX, we strike the $200 costs because that assessment was not part of the plea agreement. See Rivers v. State, 680 So.2d 495 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

Affirmed; certain conditions of probation and costs are stricken.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PATTERSON, J., concur.

Davis v. State, 700 So. 2d 92, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11199, 1997 WL 606473 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

700 So. 2d 92 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Curry v. State

682 So. 2d 1091 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)

Reyes v. State

655 So. 2d 111 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Rivers v. State

680 So. 2d 495 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Opinion

Related