Davis v. State
763 So. 2d 1233, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6799, 2000 WL 718189
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Davis v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 704 So. 2d 681 →
Opinion
Because appellant did not argue below that his one-time use of an illegal drug was not a substantial and willful violation of the condition that he not use intoxicants to excess, the issue was not preserved for appeal. Accordingly, the violation order and resulting sentence are AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davis v. State, 763 So. 2d 1233, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 6799, 2000 WL 718189 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
763 So. 2d 1233 (Davis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.