Davis v. Norfolk Southern Railroad

157 S.E. 11, 200 N.C. 345, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 324
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedFebruary 18, 1931
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 157 S.E. 11 (Davis v. Norfolk Southern Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davis v. Norfolk Southern Railroad, 157 S.E. 11, 200 N.C. 345, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 324 (N.C. 1931).

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.,

after stating the case: As suit was not brought against H. A. Lewis within one year after the death of plaintiff’s intestate, the demurrer interposed by him was properly sustained. Tieffenbrun v. Flannery, 198 N. C., 397, 151 S. E., 857. An action for wrongful death, brought under C. S., 160, is required to be instituted against the person or corporation liable therefor within one year after such death. Bennett v. R. R., 159 N. C., 345, 74 S. E., 883.

That an action was brought against the Norfolk Southern Railroad Company within the time prescribed, and judgment of voluntary non-suit entered therein, and the present action commenced against the Norfolk-Southern Railroad Company and H. A. Lewis within one year following said nonsuit, but after the lapse of more than a year from the death of plaintiff’s intestate, while sufficient to save the case as against the corporate defendant (Trull v. R. R., 151 N. C., 545, 66 S. E., 586), will not avail the plaintiff as against the demurrer of the individual defendant who was not a party to the first suit. C. S., 415. See Link v. R. R., 198 N. C., 78, 150 S. E., 672; Murray v. R. R., 196 N. C., 695, 146 S. E., 801; Capps v. R. R., 183 N. C., 181, 111 S. E., 533, and Belch v. R. R., 176 N. C., 22, 96 S. E., 640; also Motsinger v. Hauser, 195 N. C., 483, 142 S. E., 589.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cherokee Insurance Ex Rel. Weed v. R/I, Inc.
388 S.E.2d 239 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1990)
Hall v. Carroll
116 S.E.2d 459 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1960)
Colyar v. Atlantic States Motor Lines, Inc.
56 S.E.2d 647 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1949)
Wilson v. Chastain
53 S.E.2d 290 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1949)
Webb v. . Eggleston
46 S.E.2d 700 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1948)
Breen v. State
179 Misc. 42 (New York State Court of Claims, 1942)
Mathis v. Camp Manufacturing Co.
168 S.E. 515 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)
Van Kempen v. . Latham
160 S.E. 759 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
157 S.E. 11, 200 N.C. 345, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-norfolk-southern-railroad-nc-1931.