Davis v. Norfolk Southern Railroad
This text of 157 S.E. 11 (Davis v. Norfolk Southern Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
after stating the case: As suit was not brought against H. A. Lewis within one year after the death of plaintiff’s intestate, the demurrer interposed by him was properly sustained. Tieffenbrun v. Flannery, 198 N. C., 397, 151 S. E., 857. An action for wrongful death, brought under C. S., 160, is required to be instituted against the person or corporation liable therefor within one year after such death. Bennett v. R. R., 159 N. C., 345, 74 S. E., 883.
That an action was brought against the Norfolk Southern Railroad Company within the time prescribed, and judgment of voluntary non-suit entered therein, and the present action commenced against the Norfolk-Southern Railroad Company and H. A. Lewis within one year following said nonsuit, but after the lapse of more than a year from the death of plaintiff’s intestate, while sufficient to save the case as against the corporate defendant (Trull v. R. R., 151 N. C., 545, 66 S. E., 586), will not avail the plaintiff as against the demurrer of the individual defendant who was not a party to the first suit. C. S., 415. See Link v. R. R., 198 N. C., 78, 150 S. E., 672; Murray v. R. R., 196 N. C., 695, 146 S. E., 801; Capps v. R. R., 183 N. C., 181, 111 S. E., 533, and Belch v. R. R., 176 N. C., 22, 96 S. E., 640; also Motsinger v. Hauser, 195 N. C., 483, 142 S. E., 589.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
157 S.E. 11, 200 N.C. 345, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-norfolk-southern-railroad-nc-1931.