Murray v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

146 S.E. 801, 196 N.C. 695, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 76
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 6, 1929
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 146 S.E. 801 (Murray v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Murray v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad, 146 S.E. 801, 196 N.C. 695, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 76 (N.C. 1929).

Opinion

Stact, C. T.,

after stating tbe case.: Tbe demurrer was properly sustained on authority of Belch v. R. R., 176 N. C., 22, 96 S. E., 640. Section 6 of tbe Federal Employers’ Liability Act provides, among other things, “Tbat no action shall be maintained under this act unless commenced witbin two years from tbe day tbe cause of action accrued,” etc. There is no provision in this statute for extending tbe time witbin which suit may be brought by reason of a pending or former action and nonsuit suffered or entered therein. See, also, Capps v. R. R., 183 N. C., 181, 111 S. E., 533.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davis v. Norfolk Southern Railroad
157 S.E. 11 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)
Link v. Carolina & Northwestern Railway Co.
150 S.E. 672 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
146 S.E. 801, 196 N.C. 695, 1929 N.C. LEXIS 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/murray-v-atlantic-coast-line-railroad-nc-1929.