Davis v. Morgan
This text of 97 Mo. 79 (Davis v. Morgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This action was brought for personal injuries caused to plaintiff by the fall of a house owned by Robert Gf. Shaw. Such proceedings were had in the circuit court as compelled plaintiff to take a nonsuit and he has appealed here. During the present term, the death of the defendant has been suggested, and by consent, the administrator has been made a party to the action.
The merits of this cause cannot be discussed, since the action was for personal injuries, and judgment for the defendant, who, since appeal taken, has died. -The action, by reason of defendant’s death, abated, and could not be revived in the name of his administrator. R. S. 1879, secs. 96, 97. The maxim, “ actio personalis moritur cum persona” applies, and our statute, so far as concerns this case, is only declaratory of the common law. Stanley v. Bircher's Ex’r, 78 Mo. 245; 1 Chitty Pl. 77, and cas. cit.
Inasmuch as the -action has abated, the cause will be stricken from the docket.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
97 Mo. 79, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-morgan-mo-1888.