Davis v. Kingsbury
This text of 261 N.E.2d 393 (Davis v. Kingsbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Memorandum. We affirm for the reasons stated in the opinion at the Appellate Division. As that court concluded, ‘ ‘ the essential similarity of the proof offered on both hearings made the second a mere request for a rehearing.” Accordingly, the denial of the petitioner’s second application, in 1966, did not commence anew the four-month period within which review of the respondents’ determination—originally rendered in April, 1965—could be sought.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
261 N.E.2d 393, 27 N.Y.2d 567, 313 N.Y.S.2d 390, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-kingsbury-ny-1970.