Davis v. Henry
This text of 558 So. 2d 1140 (Davis v. Henry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Having concluded, for written reasons that will follow, that immediate and irreparable injury will result to the plaintiffs-in-reconvention because of the strike and picketing by defendants-in-reconvention, and finding that the trial court erred in denying the injunction sought by plaintiffs-in-reconvention, we hereby reverse and remand. The trial court shall issue an injunction by 5:00 p.m. this date, as follows:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a preliminary injunction issue herein, directed to:
Carol Davis, Pauline Fleming, Charlotte Champagne, Chris Wells, Marsha Williams, Paulette Hartman, Sonja Le-compte (individually and as officers, representatives, and members of the Terre-bonne Association of Educators, and as representatives of a class of similarly-situated employees of the Terrebonne Parish School Board), and all members, pickets and adherents of said associations acting in concert with defendants-in-re-convention and in their behalf.
These parties are hereby enjoined and prohibited from:
(1) picketing at or near the property of plaintiffs-in-reconvention;
(2) engaging in a concerted work stoppage; and
(3) inducing the employees of plaintiffs-in-reconvention to go on strike or withhold services.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
558 So. 2d 1140, 1989 WL 167659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-henry-lactapp-1989.