Davis v. Carty

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided July 22, 2025·No. 1:24-cv-06674·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SHIANNE C. DAVIS, Plaintiff, 24-CV-6674 (LTS) -against- ORDER BEATRICE CARTY, et al., Defendants. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: By order dated March 13, 2025, the Court held that Plaintiff’s complaint failed to state a claim on which relief can be granted and granted her 60 days’ leave to file an amended complaint.1 (ECF 6.) Shortly before the deadline expired, on May 8, 2025, the Court received Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time until July 13, 2025, to file an amended complaint. (ECF 7.) The Court granted the extension of time. (ECF 8.) Two months later, just as the deadline was set to expire, Plaintiff submitted another request for extension of time to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff requests an extension of time until September 16, 2025, because of her lack of legal skills.2 The Court grants Plaintiff a brief extension of time to file an amended complaint. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure require only a short and plain statement of a plaintiff’s claim. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). At the pleading stage, Plaintiff is not required to submit evidence.

1 The Court noted, among other things, that: (1) the only proper defendant in a Title VII action by a United States Postal Service employee is the Postmaster General; and that (2) for a federal employer, Title VII preempts state law claims of discrimination. 2 The Court has previously referred Plaintiff to the City Bar Justice Center’s (CBJC) SDNY Federal Pro Se Legal Assistance Project. An amended complaint form for employment discrimination cases, which the Court encourages Plaintiff to use, is attached to this order. Plaintiff can complete the amended complaint form by checking off the statutes under which she seeks relief and indicating the protected class (or classes) on which she was discriminated against. Plaintiff can also include a

short statement “alleging facts that directly show discrimination or facts that indirectly show discrimination by giving rise to a plausible inference of discrimination.” Vega v. Hempstead Union Free Sch. Dist., 801 F.3d 72, 87 (2d Cir. 2015). For example, allegations that someone in a position of authority made derogatory comments about the protected class (such as religion or disability) could give rise to an inference of discrimination. Plaintiff could also attach to her amended complaint the Notice of Right to Sue that she received from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. CONCLUSION Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time is granted in part. The Court grants Plaintiff 30 days to file the amended complaint. An amended complaint form for employment discrimination cases is attached to this order. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within this deadline,

and cannot show good cause to excuse such failure, the Court will dismiss the complaint for the reasons set forth in the March 13, 2025 order. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: July 22, 2025 New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Write the full name of each plaintiff. CV. (Include case number if one has been assigned) “against: Do you want a jury trial? L1Yes LINo

Write the full name of each defendant. The names listed above must be identical to those contained in Section |. AMENDED EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT

NOTICE The public can access electronic court files. For privacy and security reasons, papers filed with the court should therefore not contain: an individual's full social security number or full birth date; the full name of a person known to be a minor; or a complete financial account number. A filing may include only: the last four digits of a social security number; the year of an individual’s birth; a minor’s initials; and the last four digits of a financial account number. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2.

Rev. 3/24/17

I. PARTIES A. Plaintiff Information Provide the following information for each plaintiff named in the complaint. Attach additional pages if needed.

First Name Middle Initial Last Name

Street Address

County, City State Zip Code

Telephone Number Email Address (if available) B. Defendant Information To the best of your ability, provide addresses where each defendant may be served. If the correct information is not provided, it could delay or prevent service of the complaint on the defendant. Make sure that the defendants listed below are the same as those listed in the caption. (Proper defendants under employment discrimination statutes are usually employers, labor organizations, or employment agencies.) Attach additional pages if needed. Defendant 1: Name

Address where defendant may be served

County, City State Zip Code

Defendant 2: Name

Address where defendant may be served

County, City State Zip Code Defendant 3: Name

Address where defendant may be served

County, City State Zip Code II. PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT The address at which I was employed or sought employment by the defendant(s) is:

Name Address County, City State Zip Code Il. CAUSE OF ACTION A. Federal Claims This employment discrimination lawsuit is brought under (check only the options below that apply in your case): L] Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17, for employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin The defendant discriminated against me because of my (check only those that apply and explain): L] race: CL] color: L] religion: Ll sex: L] national origin:

Page 3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Davis v. Carty, (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Davis v. Carty (Davis v. Carty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)
Vega v. Hempstead Union Free School District
801 F.3d 72 (Second Circuit, 2015)