Davis v. Bennett
This text of 123 S.E. 11 (Davis v. Bennett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. A judge of the superior court has no authority to entertain a motion made in vacation to set aside a judgment of that court; and the judge committed no error in overruling the same. Haskens v. State, 114 Ga. 837 (40 S. E. 997); Chapman v. State, 116 Ga. 598 (42 S. E. 999); Malsby v. Studstill, 127 Ga. 726, 728 (56 S. E. 988); U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. First National Bank, 149 Ga. 132 (99 S. E. 529).
2. As the motion was overruled, thus treating the same as possessing validity, the proper judgment would have been one of dismissal; but inasmuch as the same result follows from the judgment actually rendered, the judgment will not be reversed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
123 S.E. 11, 158 Ga. 368, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davis-v-bennett-ga-1924.