Collins v. State

134 S.E. 181, 35 Ga. App. 577, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 997
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 13, 1926·No. 17393·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

Collins was convicted of knowingly permitting and allowing an apparatus for the manufacturing of alcoholic and intoxicating liquors to be located on his premises. The evidence amply authorized his conviction, which conviction has the approval of the trial judge; and the special grounds of the motion for a new trial, which assail the conviction of the defendant as illegal upon the ground of the relationship of a juror to one alleged to be an undisclosed prosecutor, and upon the ruling of the court on the admissibility of testimony, and the further ground of newly discovered evidence, do not show reversible error. Eor no reason pointed out did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Blood-worth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Collins v. State, 134 S.E. 181, 35 Ga. App. 577, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 997 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

134 S.E. 181 (Collins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.