Davies v. Wickstrom

105 P. 454, 56 Wash. 154, 1909 Wash. LEXIS 865
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 2, 1909
DocketNo. 8266
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 105 P. 454 (Davies v. Wickstrom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Davies v. Wickstrom, 105 P. 454, 56 Wash. 154, 1909 Wash. LEXIS 865 (Wash. 1909).

Opinion

Parker, J.

This is an action of ejectment by which the plaintiffs seek to recover from the defendant certain land in West Seattle, which they claim he is unlawfully withholding from them. Trial was had by the court without a jury, resulting in findings and judgment in favor of defendant, from which plaintiffs have appealed.

Reference to the accompanying plat, compiled from the record, which shows approximately the lines and land in dispute, will render the facts more readily understood, in connection with a statement of them. The substance of the findings made by the trial court are, that in 1874, by mesne conveyances from the United States, the defendant became possessed in fee simple, of lot 1, of Section 10, Township 24, North, of Range 3, East, which includes the land in controversy ; that in 1876 he sold and conveyed to Jacob R. Olsen and Jahan Brygger a portion of lot 1, described as follows:

“Commencing at the southeast corner of Lot 1 of Section 10, Township 24, North of Range 3 East, and running thence west along the south boundary line of said Lot 1, 9 chains and 87 links; thence north 30° 26' west 20 chains to the meander fine of the shore of Puget Sound; thence along said meander line north 47° east 6 chains and 6 links, to the mouth of a small brook; thence south 37° 57' east 7 chains and 35 links; thence east 10 chains and 1 link to the section line between Sections 10 and 11; thence south along said section line 16 chains and 46 links to the place of beginning.”

[156]*156 oT7kmmFt6cDGjKTs8Kky

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hunt v. Matthews
505 P.2d 819 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1973)
Marvel v. Barley Mill Road Homes
104 A.2d 908 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1954)
Marvel v. Barley Mill Road Homes, Inc.
104 A.2d 908 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1954)
Dungeness Cemetery Assn. v. Lotzgesell
24 P.2d 81 (Washington Supreme Court, 1933)
Gretzinger v. Wynne Wholesale Grocer Co.
35 S.W.2d 604 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1931)
Guaranty Title & Trust Corp. v. United States
264 U.S. 200 (Supreme Court, 1924)
Fagan v. Walters
197 P. 635 (Washington Supreme Court, 1921)
May v. Wolf Valley Coal Co.
180 S.W. 781 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1915)
Yarrow Land Co. v. Ross
139 P. 876 (Washington Supreme Court, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 P. 454, 56 Wash. 154, 1909 Wash. LEXIS 865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/davies-v-wickstrom-wash-1909.